'All men are equal': On such grotesque premises, the world(dis)order is based - typical juridical insanity

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:25:51 -0800, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

On Feb 8, 11:08 am, KK wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:54:09 -0800, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
On Feb 6, 5:10 am, 府寺 wrote:
On Feb 6, 4:13 am, martin wrote:

On Feb 6, 3:04 am, "Michael Laudahn
wrote:
If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build
something reasonable on it?!

The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
statement of belief in racial equality.

It must really **** you guys off that "created equal" gets so
mis-applied. Why if it wasn't for that stupid misunderstanding, I bet
you guys would be successful, happy and surrounded by friends,
admirers and loved ones.

Poor baby.

Has it been pointed out that in early revisions of the Declaration, the
slave trade was mentioned as one of the transgressions of George III?

You do realize that continuing this discussion with this pair of trolls
is kind of like throwing a stick for a Labrador Retriever.

No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be back, wagging his
tail and ready to play some more. You're not real likely to tire them
out.

Well, if they're that dopey I'd just stop replying.